<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Libertate, caritate și proprietate</title>
		<description>Comentarii legate de Libertate, caritate și proprietate</description>
		<link>http://karamazov.ro/index.php/economie-politica/473-libertate-caritate-i-proprietate.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:08:07 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://karamazov.ro/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/473/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nicolae a scris:</title>
			<link>http://karamazov.ro/index.php/economie-politica/473-libertate-caritate-i-proprietate.html#comment-1237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Un articol ce face tot banii! Daca va ganditi sa il recompuneti, plecand de la ideea ca proprietatea are in I-ul rand o componenta psihica, ce motiveaza si incurajeaza poprietarul , putem discuta.China de exemplu nu are in Constitutie garantarea, si nici macar ocrotirea proprietatii. Oare cum este "animus"ul chinezilor proprietari aparenti.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolae</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:12:51 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://karamazov.ro/index.php/economie-politica/473-libertate-caritate-i-proprietate.html#comment-1237</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
