Blogroll
- Where To Go To Follow The Unfolding Moderna Shot Manslaughter Case In Sweden, And A Few Words About Stepped Up Engagement In The War
- St. John of Kronstadt on the Saints
- St. Elizabeth the New Martyr in Cullman, AL
- Homily on the Sunday of All Saints
- First Sunday after Pentecost
- A Living Proof of the Burning Faith
- Moses of Optina
- Seymour Hersh Asks The Question On Everybody's Mind: WHO IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY? Biden Insiders Speak On Record "They're Trapped"
- What Was Funny? My Only Concern Right Now, As An American
- Remembrances for July – 2024
- MORE PAIN FOR IMPLODING DEMOCRAT JUNTA: SCOTUS OVERTURNS UNLAWFUL J6 PROSECUTIONS, J6 POLITICAL PRISONERS JUBILANT: "OUR 1512 HAS BEEN OVERTURNED. I AM NOT A FELON"
- America Wakes Up To Surreal Dream: RFK Jr. Got Most Viewers By Landslide Yet Is Un-Personed, While Trump and Biden Fight Inside CNN Box Where No Covid Genocide Is Mentioned
- Presidential Debate Outtake: Trump Strong, Biden Weak, RFK Jr. Soaring In Popularity From Adjacent Debate
- Interview 1889 – Assange is Free, But Speech…? Not so much. (NWNW 559)
- Clearing the Decks – Questions For Corbett
- Offsite Post: ‘What Would Make US Billionaires More Generous?’
- Episode 461 – I Read The Most Dangerous Superstition (And You Can, Too!)
- Here’s Why the World is Falling Apart (and What You Can Do About It!)
- Interview 1888 – James Corbett on How the Media Sausage is Made
- Offsite Post: ‘We Probably Shouldn’t Call Them Fossil Fuels’
- Interview 1887 – James Corbett Predicts the CBDC Rollout on Reality Check Radio
- Offsite Post: ‘Putting Trump’s Conviction in Historical Perspective’
- Offsite Post: ‘States Shouldn’t Kowtow to Racially-Gerrymandering Courts’
- Offsite Post: ‘“Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” Captures the Essence of Americanism’
- The Roots of Sunday as a Day of Rest and Worship
- Can Work Ruin a Feast Day? Insights from Elder Paisios
- Three Days Preceding Pascha: Insights into Holy Week
- CHD Asks Supreme Court to Hear Case Alleging FDA Misused Emergency Power by Authorizing COVID Shots for Children
- “May my Prayer be Set before You…” Exploring a Lenten Chant
- 2024 Secret Angel Christmas Charity Campaign Results
- The Other Child
- CHD Wins in Los Angeles ‘Smart City’ Public Records Case, Gaining Access to Thousands of Withheld Documents Regarding Rollout of Artificial Intelligence
- ‘Alleluia’: Exploring the Depth of the Shortest Doxology
- Judge Rules in Historic CHD Lawsuit Challenging Fast-tracking of Wireless Infrastructure in Los Angeles
- CHD Supports the Motion Against U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Alleging Fraud in Omnibus Autism Proceeding
- CHD to Host ‘The Rally to Reclaim Free Speech’ as SCOTUS Hears Landmark Censorship Case Murthy v. Missouri
- Autobiography of Alexandros Papadiamantis
- A hindu convert to Orthodoxy
- Un hindus convertit la Ortodoxie
- Alexandros Papadiamantis Resource Page
- How Great Spiritual Figures of Greece Helped Form the Renowned Conductor Dimitri Mitropoulos
- Artificial Intelligence as Artificial Brilliance (Metr. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos)
- How to fight any passion
- Pr. Serghei Baranov – Cum să te lupți împotriva oricărei patimi
- The Catacomb Church (1991)
- Movie: "Men of Anjolos" (1997) - An Islamic Movie on the Life of the Seven Youths of Ephesus
- The story of a repentant Sergian Priest!
- A brutal crush and a dark Ecclesiastical secret!
- Tortured for Orthodoxy: concerning Mother Joanna (†1998)
- The Bitten Apple of Apple Inc. (Metr. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos)
- 41 Testimonies: on Sergianism and the "ecclesial" status of the Soviet Church
- Hymn of love
- Imnul iubirii
- The Eternal Day
- Follow Me
- I will give you rest
- Single Mind, Simple Life – Gospel for the Third Sunday of Matthew
- Save your soul with fear of God
- Enduring skillfully
- Orthodoxy is unique
Cele mai citite
- Să învățăm să iubim
- Clark Carlton: Modernity considers sub-natural existence the sumit of human progress
- Dostoevsky for Parents and Children: (IV) Merchant Skotoboinikov's Story
- O mica problema de retorica
- 101 carti de necitit intr-o viata
- O stire: moartea presei.
- Totalitarism homosexual
- Alternativa Nicusor Dan. Nula
- Cu ochii larg închiși
- Evolutionism pe intelesul tuturor
Axa Beijing - Bruxelles | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Polemici |
Scris de Ninel Ganea |
Luni, 17 Iunie 2013 21:32 |
Iar daca ar fi sa incadram undeva eforturile simbolului “dreptei romanesti” ar fi tocmai in aceasta directie, a instaurarii totale a valorilor euro-atlantice, intelese ca un model social, transnational, multicultural, construit arbitrar de la un centru superbirocratizat. Deci, nu suntem foarte departe de idealul extrem oriental. De pilda, o propunere de modificare a Constitutiei, realizata de ganditoarea noastra, a trecut aproape neobservata, desi contine implicatii teribil de periculoase la adresa libertatii personale. “Eliminarea prezumţiei de dobândire licită a averii din art. 44 alin. 8, pentru a face posibilă aplicarea legislatiei europene în materia confiscării în domeniul crimei organizate si terorismului. Nu există astfel de prevederi in Constitutiile altor state din Uniunea Europeană, Statele Unite ale Americii sau Canada, exceptia fiind Republica Moldova, care a preluat prevederea din Constitutia României”. Asa suna inovatia, intr-adevar, extraordinara, adusa legii supreme, dar sa vedem care sunt problemele legate de ea. In primul rand, autoarea nu ne lamureste sub nicio forma daca intelege prin proprietate si altceva in afara de proprietatea imobiliara. Din cum este formulata problema, ar parea ca in filozofia ei se poate trasa foarte usor o distinctie intre proprietate si avere, ceea ce in practica este aproape imposbil. Consecintele acestei confuzii sunt dezastruoase deoarece arunca sub semnul intrebarii insusi statutul proprietatii. Ideea de care nu tine seama aceasta prevedere este ca societatile actuale au deja mecanisme legale prin care poate fi demonstrat caracterul ilicit. De aceea, “the burden of proof” cade pe umerii reclamantului, nu a celui incriminat. Mai mult, garantarea proprietatii are, printre altele, si scopul de a constitui un baraj in fata puterii agresive a statului si a cohortei lui de birocrati. Si din acest motiv, Richard Weaver a numit dreptul de proprietate “ultimul drept metafizic”. “It may indeed appear before the struggle is over that the attack upon private property is but a further expression of the distrust of reason with which our age seems fatally stricken. When it is no longer believed that there is a restraining reason in accordance with which men may act, it follows that the state cannot permit individual centers of control. The repudiation of transcendentalism compels the state to believe that the individual centers of control will be governed by pure egotism, as indeed they largely are at present. At the same time, this repudiation pushes aside the concept of inviolability” (Ideas Have Consequences). In fine, chiar daca scopul prevederii poate fi unul nobil (nu este!), traditia dreptei, de la care politiciana noastra se revendica, avertizeaza in nenumarate instante asupra tiraniei bunelor intentii. Mai mult, istoria, un alt aliat indispensabil al oricarui reprezentant al dreptei, ne-a invatat asupra pericolelor inspaimantatoare rezultate din acordarea unor puteri extinse statului si agentilor sai. De pilda, “Patriot Act”, ca sa luam un exemplu foarte recent, este sinonim cu o ingradire considerabila a drepturilor si libertatilor fundamentale, in acelasi scop al prevenirii terorismului. In aceeasi ordine de idei, insasi definitia terorismului si a crimei organizate poate fi extinsa in asa fel incat sa surprinda orice tip de comportament considerat indezirabil pentru status-quo. De aici, pana la hartuirea si confiscarea proprietatii indivizilor neinregimentati nu mai sunt foarte multi pasi de facut. Dar justificarea suprema, in opinia europarlamentarei, o reprezinta, de buna seama, documentele europene: “Nici Articolul 1 al Protocolului 1 aditional la Conventia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului, care priveste Protectia proprietatii, nu face nicio referire la prezumarea dobandirii licite a acesteia, ci doar la respectarea bunurilor persoanelor fizice sau juridice”. Referinta la documentele comunitare este omniprezenta in discursul reprezentantei si tine locul gandirii vii. In absenta unor argumente cat de cat mai solide, practic, frecvent, ai senzatia ca lipseste din peisaj persoana umana si ai in fata doar o masina de propaganda a birocratiei bruxelleze. Cuvinte scrasnite, priviri incruntate si o pasiune mistuitoare pentru purificarea societatii de elementele corupte. Nicio referinta la natura umana (cazuta), la limitarea statului, la preventie, la istorie sau traditie. Totul se rezuma la remodelarea societatii pe calapodul valorilor europene de data recenta. Nici macar nu poti spune ca esti confruntat cu un efort rationalist, ci pur si simplu cu o imitatie ingrosata a celor mai nefaste idei provenite din Leviathanul comunitar. Din aceasta perspectiva, traseul de la procuror comunist la cel de europarlamentar, trecand prin cel de vesnic aparator al “drepturilor” minoritatilor de tot felul, nu mai pare atat de surprinzator… |