Blogroll
- Offsite Post: ‘Advice for the Exiles’
- Did Tiffany Dover Die That Day? If You Think So, You're The Problem, According To The New Journalism Of Foregone Conclusions
- Interview 1853 - Right Wing Rising? - #NewWorldNextWeek
- New Zealand Database Administrator Who Designed System For "Providers" To Get Paid Per Shot Given, Crosses Ranks And Joins Opposition: Tearfully Confesses To Liz Gunn STAGGERINGLY High Death Counts
- BREAK IN SETH RICH COVERUP: Texas Judge Gives FBI A FINAL 14 Days To Turn Over All Documentation Around Seth Rich's Work and Personal Laptop, DVD and Tape Drives—FBI Wanted To Stall For 66 Years
- Interview 1852 - From the Media Matrix to the NWO on Packets and Bolts
- Remembrances for December – 2023
- Saturday Night Film: "Creatures Of Light"
- Go, and Do Thou Likewise: On the Good Samaritan
- What is Truth?
- The Difference Between Orthodox Spirituality and Other Traditions
- The Parable of the Good Samaritan
- The Calendar Question
- St. John Chrysostom
- Documentary Film "Shot Dead" Is Very Hard To Watch: Parents Who Lost Their Children, Killed By Covid Shots, Tell Their Stories
- Guess Who the Cat Dragged In?
- Offsite Post: ‘Orthodoxy in Bayou Land’
- Navigating Life’s Storms: Father Fyodor Konyukhov’s Five Spiritual Signposts
- For The Great Relief Of Having You To Talk To
- Episode 454 - JFK: From Mongoose to Gladio
- Best 105 Ideas for Christmas Presents 2023
- Offsite Post: ‘Riches to Rags’
- Interview 1851 - New World Dis-Order on CHD TV
- THIS is How Global Government is Run (and What's Coming Next...)
- Offsite Post: ‘The Good Shepherd Solution’
- Children’s Health Defense Statement on War and Children
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Receives the Defender Award from Children’s Health Defense
- Offsite Post: ‘AI and the Image of the Beast at the End of the World’
- Children’s Health Defense Launches ‘Reform Pharma’ to Restore Healthcare Integrity
- The Birth of New Iconography: A Tale of One Icon
- Archbishop in the Basement: St John (Pommers) of Riga
- How to Become an Orthodox Priest
- Understanding the Meaning of Christ’s Words in Matthew 5:29-30
- Children’s Health Defense Claims Victory as New York Supreme Court Upholds Ruling to Rescind COVID Vaccine Mandates for Healthcare Workers
- Federal Court Grants Injunction Against CISA in Historic Censorship Case Expected to Head to Supreme Court
- Artificial Intelligence as Artificial Brilliance (Metr. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos)
- CHD Intervenes on Behalf of Residents in Belmar, NJ To Fight Verizon 5G Towers on Jersey Shore
- How to fight any passion
- Pr. Serghei Baranov – Cum să te lupți împotriva oricărei patimi
- The Catacomb Church (1991)
- Movie: "Men of Anjolos" (1997) - An Islamic Movie on the Life of the Seven Youths of Ephesus
- The story of a repentant Sergian Priest!
- A brutal crush and a dark Ecclesiastical secret!
- Tortured for Orthodoxy: concerning Mother Joanna (†1998)
- The Bitten Apple of Apple Inc. (Metr. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos)
- 41 Testimonies: on Sergianism and the "ecclesial" status of the Soviet Church
- Hymn of love
- Imnul iubirii
- The Eternal Day
- Follow Me
- I will give you rest
- Single Mind, Simple Life – Gospel for the Third Sunday of Matthew
- Save your soul with fear of God
- Enduring skillfully
- Rocker Roy Gallagher Concert in Athens in 1981 (And the Ticket of Orthodox Theologian Panagiotis Nellas)
- Maria Menounos Fulfills a Dream By Visiting the Tomb of Saint Nektarios
- Abbess Theonymphi, Who Was Once a Famous Greek Singer, Has Reposed
- Orthodoxy is unique
- Unicitatea Ortodoxiei
- Saint Siluan Athonite described by Metropolitan Anthony Bloom
Cele mai citite
- Să învățăm să iubim
- Clark Carlton: Modernity considers sub-natural existence the sumit of human progress
- Dostoevsky for Parents and Children: (IV) Merchant Skotoboinikov's Story
- O mica problema de retorica
- 101 carti de necitit intr-o viata
- O stire: moartea presei.
- Alternativa Nicusor Dan. Nula
- Totalitarism homosexual
- Cu ochii larg închiși
- Evolutionism pe intelesul tuturor
Shame | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Critica de film |
Scris de Ninel Ganea |
Marţi, 27 Martie 2012 08:57 |
Din acest punct de vedere, meritul lui McQueen in alegerea unui astfel de subiect imi pare remarcabil. Insa problema principala a productiei o reprezinta, in opinia mea, absenta unui diagnostic si a unui remediu. Sigur ca filmul nu reprezinta analiza sociala si ar fi absurd sa ai pretentii de tratat moral de la o pelicula. Dar o creatie artistica, iar un film cu atat mai mult, are anumite presupozitii (antropologice, cel putin) ale regizorului si o anumita filozofie morala implicite. De regula, mai ales cand vorbim de filmele independente, “de arta”, ale ultimilor 30 de ani, aceasta etica este una relativist-nihilista in care autorul descrie printr-o succesiune de cadre foarte lungi, in care abunda violenta, non-comunicarea si sexualitatea aberanta, lumea de astazi. Foarte putini cineasti isi asuma manifest aceasta perspectiva, majoritatea preferand optiunea “value free”, declarand ca nu fac altceva decat sa arate un fenomen, fara sa-l judece. Misiune imposibila! Revenind la “Shame”, ceea ce ma nemultumeste in primul rand este tocmai absenta oricaror criterii prin care personajul principal poate fi analizat sub specie morala. Din film reiese ca eroul isi pune serios problema dependentei de sex abia in momentul in care sora sa este aproape de moarte. Insa aceasta solutie, relativ credibila (dependenta se repercuteaza indirect asupra celor apropiati ), nu rezolva sub nicio forma problema de fond. Regizorul afirma ca a vrut sa arate cat de fragili suntem, traind intr-o lume in care oamenii nu mai au vointa proprie. Am putea interpreta aceasta declaratie ca o forma de determinism sau ca o forma de romantism. In ambele cazuri, nu exista nicio varianta prin care sa poti argumenta serios ca dependenta reprezinta o problema personala, in alt sens decat legal. Iar dependenta de sex nu se pedepseste, inca, se incurajeaza. Asa ca daca lumea prezentata de film este una complet amorala, bazata doar pe eficienta materiala, cu personaje fara contururi personale, alienate de orice relatii umane satisfacatoare, de unde provin instrumentele de analiza ale unui caz ca fiind problematic? Cum putem spune ca e ceva gresit in optiunile eroului? In film vedem dificultatile sale, vedem efectele dezastruaoase asupra personalitatilor (pentru cei cu optiuni morale implicite sau explicite) insa pana la final nu primim raspuns la intrebarea esentiala de ce este o problema dependenta de sex? Cineva, nici macar foarte cinic, ar putea raspunde ca in fapt excesul de sex (raportat oricum la cazurile de “normalitate” vaga) constituie aberatia, in rest nefiind mari dificultati psihologice sau materiale. Daca oamenii isi controleaza adecvat instinctele dependenta se transforma in consum regulat, ceea ce e in nota obsinuita a zilelor noastre. De asemenea, “Shame” nu ne da nici macar cel mai mic indiciu de ce ajunge cineva dependent, chiar daca am stabilit ca acest concept este introdus arbitrar, adica nejustificat, in logica filmului. Mai mult, filmul se transforma implicit intr-o invitatie la explorarea dependentei prin abundenta de imagini explicite servite sub pretextul prezentarii “realitatii asa cum e”. Insa nimeni nu are un contact direct, obiectiv cu realitatea. Prezentarea unui personaj gol se face dintr-un unghi anume. Exista multe alte perspective prin care poate fi infatisat. Obiectivitatea clamata de cineast e insa doar un subiectivism servit sub forma de neutralitate.
|