Blogroll
- Paris Olympics Opening Ceremony Predictably Seeks To Out-Satan Previous Satanist Productions, And May Have Succeeded
- Netanyahu Claimed In Speech Iran Threatened To Kill Trump; Alex Jones Believes It's Predictive Programming: "If Trump Gets Killed Now Because Of Netanyahu Saying That, HE Becomes A Prime Suspect."
- Offsite Post: ‘The US and the Black Abyss of Revolution’
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Issues Stark Warning To Americans That HHS Has Issued PREP Act Declaration For Bird Flu, Ordered 4.8 Million Doses Of Dangerous "Vaccine—" Kennedy Vows To Stop This Madness
- Why Is There No Joy after Communion?
- Interview 1894 – AI Ring of Steel Descends on Paris (NWNW 563)
- Netanyahu Gets 58 Standing Ovations In Congress: Claims Almost No Civilians Killed in Gaza; 3 Years After AIPAC Started Direct Donations To US Politicians, And After Israel's Darkest Year...
- Rabbi Explains The Biblical Prophecy That Has Trump Assisting "The Jewish Kingdom Over All Of Mankind In Jerusalem," And "Surrendering" The United States To It; First His Right Ear Had To Be Grazed
- Trump Recording Emerges In Which He Reveals Netanyahu Never Wanted To Make A Deal. "I Thought The Palestinians Were Impossible And That The Israelis Would Do Anything To Make Peace And A Deal...
- Was WWI a Royal Affair? – Questions For Corbett
- Offsite Post: ‘The Bill Cassidy Comedy Tour’
- Poisoning Your Data – #SolutionsWatch
- A Brief History of Political Assassinations
- On the Love for God
- Homily on the Fourth Sunday of Matthew
- Feast of the Kazan Icon of the Mother Of God
- The Faith of the Centurion
- Saint Prokopios the Great Martyr
- Fourth Sunday after Pentecost
- The Final Days of the Iconic Fashion Designer Billy Bo
- Offsite Post: ‘The Good Ol’ Boy Network Extends beyond Louisiana’
- Interview 1893 – ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??? (NWNW 562)
- Our Summit For Our Future – #SolutionsWatch
- Through Hallucinations and Delirium: What Words Will I Be Repeating on My Deathbed?
- Offsite Post: ‘St Brigid vs Taylor Swift: Examining What Is Truly Beautiful for Our Daughters’
- Offsite Post: ‘Elements’
- Offsite Post: ‘The First Amendment Has Got to Go!’
- Results of Our 2024 Easter Basket Charity Event
- Achieving Serenity in Social Bonds: Insights from Bishop Athanasios
- “We Didn’t Hold a Grudge Against God despite the Shock”: A Story of a Terrible Diagnosis, Acceptance, and a Miracle
- The Mountain that Bears the Lord’s Footprint
- Children’s Health Defense Responds to SCOTUS Decision in Murthy v. Missouri
- CHD Scientists Discover Vaccine-Induced Diseases in Infants Increase Exponentially with Every Added Vaccine
- New Study by CHD’s Brian Hooker and Jacob Puliyel, M.D. Raises Safety Concerns Over Infant Rotavirus Vaccine in India
- New Book from CHD/Skyhorse Publishing Chronicles Illegal Military Anthrax Jab Mandate
- Unyielding
- CHD Asks Supreme Court to Hear Case Alleging FDA Misused Emergency Power by Authorizing COVID Shots for Children
- Autobiography of Alexandros Papadiamantis
- A hindu convert to Orthodoxy
- Un hindus convertit la Ortodoxie
- Alexandros Papadiamantis Resource Page
- How Great Spiritual Figures of Greece Helped Form the Renowned Conductor Dimitri Mitropoulos
- Artificial Intelligence as Artificial Brilliance (Metr. Hierotheos of Nafpaktos)
- How to fight any passion
- Pr. Serghei Baranov – Cum să te lupți împotriva oricărei patimi
- The Catacomb Church (1991)
- Movie: "Men of Anjolos" (1997) - An Islamic Movie on the Life of the Seven Youths of Ephesus
- The story of a repentant Sergian Priest!
- A brutal crush and a dark Ecclesiastical secret!
- Tortured for Orthodoxy: concerning Mother Joanna (†1998)
- 41 Testimonies: on Sergianism and the "ecclesial" status of the Soviet Church
- Hymn of love
- Imnul iubirii
- The Eternal Day
- Follow Me
- I will give you rest
- Single Mind, Simple Life – Gospel for the Third Sunday of Matthew
- Save your soul with fear of God
- Enduring skillfully
- Orthodoxy is unique
Cele mai citite
- Să învățăm să iubim
- Clark Carlton: Modernity considers sub-natural existence the sumit of human progress
- Dostoevsky for Parents and Children: (IV) Merchant Skotoboinikov's Story
- O mica problema de retorica
- 101 carti de necitit intr-o viata
- O stire: moartea presei.
- Totalitarism homosexual
- Alternativa Nicusor Dan. Nula
- Cu ochii larg închiși
- Evolutionism pe intelesul tuturor
Shame | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Critica de film |
Scris de Ninel Ganea |
Marţi, 27 Martie 2012 08:57 |
Din acest punct de vedere, meritul lui McQueen in alegerea unui astfel de subiect imi pare remarcabil. Insa problema principala a productiei o reprezinta, in opinia mea, absenta unui diagnostic si a unui remediu. Sigur ca filmul nu reprezinta analiza sociala si ar fi absurd sa ai pretentii de tratat moral de la o pelicula. Dar o creatie artistica, iar un film cu atat mai mult, are anumite presupozitii (antropologice, cel putin) ale regizorului si o anumita filozofie morala implicite. De regula, mai ales cand vorbim de filmele independente, “de arta”, ale ultimilor 30 de ani, aceasta etica este una relativist-nihilista in care autorul descrie printr-o succesiune de cadre foarte lungi, in care abunda violenta, non-comunicarea si sexualitatea aberanta, lumea de astazi. Foarte putini cineasti isi asuma manifest aceasta perspectiva, majoritatea preferand optiunea “value free”, declarand ca nu fac altceva decat sa arate un fenomen, fara sa-l judece. Misiune imposibila! Revenind la “Shame”, ceea ce ma nemultumeste in primul rand este tocmai absenta oricaror criterii prin care personajul principal poate fi analizat sub specie morala. Din film reiese ca eroul isi pune serios problema dependentei de sex abia in momentul in care sora sa este aproape de moarte. Insa aceasta solutie, relativ credibila (dependenta se repercuteaza indirect asupra celor apropiati ), nu rezolva sub nicio forma problema de fond. Regizorul afirma ca a vrut sa arate cat de fragili suntem, traind intr-o lume in care oamenii nu mai au vointa proprie. Am putea interpreta aceasta declaratie ca o forma de determinism sau ca o forma de romantism. In ambele cazuri, nu exista nicio varianta prin care sa poti argumenta serios ca dependenta reprezinta o problema personala, in alt sens decat legal. Iar dependenta de sex nu se pedepseste, inca, se incurajeaza. Asa ca daca lumea prezentata de film este una complet amorala, bazata doar pe eficienta materiala, cu personaje fara contururi personale, alienate de orice relatii umane satisfacatoare, de unde provin instrumentele de analiza ale unui caz ca fiind problematic? Cum putem spune ca e ceva gresit in optiunile eroului? In film vedem dificultatile sale, vedem efectele dezastruaoase asupra personalitatilor (pentru cei cu optiuni morale implicite sau explicite) insa pana la final nu primim raspuns la intrebarea esentiala de ce este o problema dependenta de sex? Cineva, nici macar foarte cinic, ar putea raspunde ca in fapt excesul de sex (raportat oricum la cazurile de “normalitate” vaga) constituie aberatia, in rest nefiind mari dificultati psihologice sau materiale. Daca oamenii isi controleaza adecvat instinctele dependenta se transforma in consum regulat, ceea ce e in nota obsinuita a zilelor noastre. De asemenea, “Shame” nu ne da nici macar cel mai mic indiciu de ce ajunge cineva dependent, chiar daca am stabilit ca acest concept este introdus arbitrar, adica nejustificat, in logica filmului. Mai mult, filmul se transforma implicit intr-o invitatie la explorarea dependentei prin abundenta de imagini explicite servite sub pretextul prezentarii “realitatii asa cum e”. Insa nimeni nu are un contact direct, obiectiv cu realitatea. Prezentarea unui personaj gol se face dintr-un unghi anume. Exista multe alte perspective prin care poate fi infatisat. Obiectivitatea clamata de cineast e insa doar un subiectivism servit sub forma de neutralitate.
|